With so many different rehab programs available, it’s challenging to know what’s the best choice from the start. Is inpatient, outpatient, residential and partial hospitalization all the same? Is one better than the other? Does the terminology even matter? Because it’s enough to make someone’s head spin. But there are differences for a reason, and acknowledging where and how they differ can help identify where an approach makes sense in a given situation.
Addiction treatment is not a one-size-fits-all approach. What works for one person, and in what context, can be entirely ineffective for someone else, based on a variety of factors: how addictive the substance is, home environment, work responsibilities, mental health disorders, previous attempts at treatment and more.
That’s why knowing about the major types of rehab programs gives families and individuals the power to choose what’s appropriate for their situation rather than relying on whatever’s available or acceptable through insurance at any given time.
Residential Inpatient Programs
The most intensive level of treatment is a residential program. This typically requires 24/7 onsite living for a predetermined period, 30, 60 or 90 days generally (fewer days is rare and some programs last longer but a specific time is best).
24/7 access to treatment in a therapeutic setting provides the environment needed for those away from triggers and stressors that normally facilitate substance use in the real world. Inpatient settings are heavily structured; days are filled with individual therapy sessions (generally 1-2 sessions a week with a therapist), group counseling sessions, educational workshops on addiction with recreational exercises involved including art therapy or yoga.
It’s important to note that there are medical professionals around 24/7, especially for those still experiencing withdrawal symptoms at the beginning or looking to manage medication-based needs after detoxification.
This level works best for those with severe addictive tendencies after multiple relapses or as a stepping down of outpatient care that reveals more needs than were anticipated. This is especially true for those whose home environments do not support sobriety efforts or who live with others still actively using substances.
It also works well for those with dual diagnosis issues (substance abuse issues alongside mental health issues) if clinicians within the facility can treat both through one setting. Essentially, when comprehensive support is necessary, a rehabilitation center in Arlington, TX has the medical oversight and therapeutic engagement required for this essential early recovery phase.
However, this method also requires a person to disconnect from reality for a time. One has toput their job on hold, home responsibilities must be shifted to someone else (if applicable), and social responsibilities must be put on pause until treatment is over. This may pose financial issues or logistical challenges that render this option unfeasible for some families.
Partial Hospitalization Programs (PHP)
Partial hospitalization is the “in between” stage from actual inpatient residential treatment to outpatient care. Patients engage in treatment for several hours per day (generally five to seven) but are allowed to return home each night. PHP programs run five to seven days a week since it’s an intensive option that requires no overnight accommodations.
A daily structure looks similar to inpatient treatment, albeit several hours shorter, including individual therapy sessions, group counseling opportunities, medication management and workshops focused on coping strategies and prevention support skills.
However, patients also re-enter the world nightly, are encouraged to manage family-based situations that may arise and practice coping skills in limited but real-world experiences each day, instead of merely going home and avoiding temptation at all costs.
This type of treatment works best when it serves as a step-down option from more intensive care. For example, someone who was just inpatient may feel overwhelmed adjusting straight back into life with only once-weekly therapy sessions; PHP offers a re-entry into daily living while almost offering daily support still.
This is also a good approach for those who need serious treatment options, but can’t step away from their home life entirely; those with children needing care, elderly parents requiring support and even jobs with flexible opportunities that do not support long stretches of absence but do support limited hours a week.
Intensive Outpatient Programs (IOP)
Intensive outpatient programming requires patients to attend 3-5 days per week for about three hours for each session. This non-intensive schedule is great for those who want assistance without sacrificing their regular lifestyle; this ensures patients get the support they need while still going back full-time to work and/or full-time schooling during this time required.
IOPs offer similar components (therapy and group education) but they’re condensed into fewer hours and likely groups. IOP works best as someone transitioning down from PHP or someone with strong home support systems who will not fall easily into relapse; this is appropriate for those who have moderate levels of addiction at present or who may have found themselves out of touch with reality but still have steps to take to get fully involved back in their lives.
However, this option also encourages independent living without too much oversight, and this takes phenomenal self-discipline and willpower from all involved. Patients go back into daily life with triggers galore and maintain that familiar reality without any guidance or redirection in case something goes awry. This can set too many people up for failure, including those with strong addictive tendencies already and without strong home support systems.
Standard Outpatient Treatment
Standard outpatient treatment options include meeting once or twice weekly with a therapist/counselor for about an hour per session. This is the least intensive option and operates under a maintenance mindset of implementation.
General outpatient programs provide the most flexible opportunities; people can continue their everyday schedules while blending treatment into the mix surrounding work and other family dynamics. Outpatient also tends to be the cheapest option since it requires far fewer resources than previously mentioned levels at least one time through.
Yet outpatient alone does not work for the majority of people, or even a substantial percentage. Those with severe addiction tendencies, unstable home environments, co-occurring mental health disorders or histories of relapse need greater initial support sooner; relying on outpatient alone for programming needs will only render substance use or relapse occurring within minutes to hours after use, once essentially released back into the world.
How to Determine Which Level of Care Makes Sense
So how do people know which type of rehab makes the most sense? There are steps that determine healthiness before choosing which one makes sense.
First, the severity of addiction plays a major role; someone using (and we know it’s not always just opiates and alcohol) at home consistently day in and day out needs different requirements than someone who only occasionally overuses prescribed medications out in public.
The American Society of Addiction Medicine guidelines assess six dimensions through which assessments are made, the potential severity (acute intoxication/use encourages continued use), likelihood of withdrawal symptoms occurring and whether they need resources, co-occurring medical conditions (some happen at initiation just from substance use), co-occurring mental health conditions as well, potential environment risk for relapse versus encouraging recovery (home as opposed to out-of-treatment) all add significant rationale to clinical recommendations based on severity experienced.
Second, attempts at prior access help bolster future programming needs; if someone uses outpatient several times or IOP adjustments but cannot make positive change it suggests higher programming needs sooner; if they’ve completed residential successfully once they may be best suited through drop-down options, suggested through PHP in IOP before returning back again a year later when it’s back up on repeat.
Third, a home environment helps assess options; if someone’s living with active substance abusers, the likelihood of having to return to triggering neighborhoods makes this all exponentially more difficult, residential treatment takes someone out-of-the-situation that’s fueling substance use patterns in the beginning; however it only works if someone’s home situation does not also have concerns, children needing appropriate care or elderly parents needing attention.
Finally, mental health conditions provide insight into risky treatment options; Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders including PTSD all fall under mental health conditions that make people vulnerable to substance use as self-medication while simultaneously exasperating their tendencies since treating both requires trained professionals within confined space equipped to manage multiple issues, all from one facility without having to travel around town, necessary but requiring greater levels of care first.
An Aftercare Approach Is Everything
Regardless of which level someone starts from successful long-term help hinges upon aftercare planning, just because someone completed a program doesn’t mean help stops there, they need continued support once, if not twice, a week through additional one-on-one meetings or meetings held in alumni-based rooms/sober living environments in case they’re new guests.
Transitioning out-of-therapy opportunity renders people vulnerable most, stepping down from PHP back into regular life is tougher than coming down from IOP back into weekly meetings when they confront quasi-independent living but the coping strategies acquired haven’t solidified quite yet enough yet.
The best programming incorporates aftercare planning throughout, not just tacking it on at the end when it’s over; Counselors can anticipate obstacles most (biggest triggers) while establishing coping strategies through community resources especially linked up directly to relapse prevention plans that map out what occurred instead of where they’re going after they’ve put forth effort into better choice making.
The Bottom Line
There’s no right answer, or wrong one, in determining which makes sense; most effective alternatives arise from clinical assessments which merge commonsensical conclusions with insurance realities blended with established preferences where applicable.
Accessing the opinion of an addiction specialist begins this process effectively assessing which level makes sense based upon determined resources accrued.
Ultimately, but especially for addiction, it’s better to take that first step toward getting help instead of being stuck in one’s current situation even if it means starting out planning on a preferred option initially finding it was only good down the line once undertaken properly.
No one wants time spent on addiction, the faster appeal toward sobriety means individuals are gaining connections earlier that can benefit them later, and nobody should fear there’s no way out, there’s always a tailored solution regardless of anticipated situations once help has arrived initially.
People also read this: 5 Tips to Multiply B2B Sales Opportunities With Smart Outreach
